The Politically Incorrect Mom


Tuesday, October 11, 2005

The ACLU Believes Sex Offenders Should Live With Children...Not in MY State!

This article about a woman who may lose custody of her unborn child because she is married to a sex-offender is disturbing on many levels. Of course the ACLU is involved – which only muddies the waters, but I am having a hard time looking at it through the eyes of the Children and Youth Services Department. Don’t get me wrong…I don’t think this family should have any children! I just can’t get past the mother and her stupidity.

First, the woman lost custody of her other child (21 months old) because the state wouldn’t allow her to raise the child in a home with a sex-offender. The ACLU says the state has no right to “punish further” the man who raped and sodomized two teenaged girls. I agree with that. I believe the punishment should fit the crime and when a person leaves prison, they should not be further punished. HOWEVER, this crime, by it’s nature, requires that the community at large be kept safe and informed and that the government do everything in their power to keep an eye on the offender to safeguard against future crimes – thus the birth of the State Police Sex Offender Registry, which lists sex offenders in our state.

It has long since been established that sex-offenders are not being rehabilitated in prison. This is a disorder that runs much deeper than any drug addiction or social problem a person may have that leads them into the legal system.

Personally, I think those who are found guilty of sexual offenses against children should be neutered. It’s the only way to insure against them creating their own victims. But that’s for another post.

My biggest problem is with the mother. I have this to say to her:

Women who date or marry sex offenders have problems that need dealt with to say the least – but if it’s only your life that is in question…knock yourself out – you get what you pay for. However, what mother in a decent or right mind would even so much as date a sex offender when you have children at home – much less procreate with a man who has a history of sexual perversion against children (teenagers are children!). I knew a woman who was in your shoes, Mrs. WolfHawk. She, too, gave up her child to be with her pervert boyfriend. She, too, allowed her child to be in foster care – and while promised by the state that they would return the child to her if she would just get rid of the sex-offender in her life – she married him instead. YOU are not a mommy. YOU have no right to say that you are living every mother’s worst nightmare because YOU created this nightmare. You know nothing of a mother’s love and protection for her children. You are selfish and blind. You have no right to raise children in the home you have created.
Do your children a favor and sign all parental rights to your 21 month old child and the child that is growing inside you over to the State of Pennsylvania and allow them to place them in a home where they will be loved and protected. Then go to the hospital and have your ovaries removed.

Nuff said.


  • At 4:58 PM, October 11, 2005, Blogger Neo-Con Tastic said…

    Amen. Absurdity at best. The mother obviously shouldn't have the child because she bears no common sense.

    I just can't get over the ACLU though. Have they ever tried a good case? Good as in moral or ethical? Have they ever sided with the church? Or the baby? The Anti-Christian Lawyers Union (ACLU) needs to be stopped. We have to start speaking our mind against these monsters who defend perverts and murderers.

  • At 9:40 PM, October 11, 2005, Blogger P.I. Mom said…

    Amen to that! I'm tired of their blatant disregard for human life as well as the psychological warfare against our children. I'm almost pissed enough to start a campaign of my own!


Post a Comment

<< Home


Web Counter
Hit Counter
Since August 1, 2005

And one last teeny tiny detail...
This web site and all contents are the property of The Politically Incorrect Mom.
Use of contents without permission is strictly forbidden.
Please contact The Empress of this page for permissions.
Copyright 2005