Wednesday, September 27, 2006
A Call to Conservative Bloggers
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Here We Go Again!
According to an NBC news report tonight - some people may not get enough counseling to understand what a positive test result means. Are you kidding me? With the repetitive hysteria that comes from the media regarding AIDS - is there really anyone left in the free world who wouldn't know what a positive HIV test means?
The idiots on NBC suggested that this will take an attitude change because some people haven't come to terms with the idea of having their cholesterol checked. Yes, I agree....people are just HYSTERICAL about the thought of having their cholesterol checked.
Cut the crap CDC & NBC.
Sunday, September 17, 2006
More Celebrity Verbal Diarrhea
It's no secret that I hate it when celebrities get on a soap box and talk about things they know nothing about. It makes no difference if it's politics, healthcare, legal or other opinionated advice - they need to understand that the world is full of little lemmings, marching to the beat of a liberal drum who don't think for themselves. There are millions of people who believe that just because someone is a celebrity, they are smarter than the rest of us - SOOOOO NOT TRUE!!!!
I can't stand Rosie O'Donnell on many levels, but her latest rant on "The View" has got to take the cake! If you didn't see it or hear about it - here's the skinny... (no, I do NOT watch the view, but you can see the video on Comast's "The Fan")
When discussing diaper rash on this ridiculous wanna-be-an-informative-program, Rosie gave this advice:
"Here's what you do for diaper rash, you get a friend whose dog just had babies, you bring your baby over with the puppies, you leave the baby naked and the dog will lick the babies hynee - this is what a doctor told me because there is antiseptic in the dogs tongue and the diaper rash will go away -(everyone goes nuts almost gagging on national television) you don't believe me but I have four kids and I've tried it."
Ok, besides how perverse the whole thing sounds - what's worse is that there are no doubt lemmings all over the United States and abroad today, trying this irresponsible, dangerous "home remedy" because Rosie O'Donnell said so. I am sure her pediatrician is thrilled to be associated with this crack pot.
So, I thought I would talk to a real expert and get some advice - just in case someone stupid enough to believe Rosie O'Donnell happens to stop by and read this blog (unlikely, I know - but hey, I'm doing my part). The expert I chose is a very dear friend of mine who is a veterinarian. Who better to tell me if there is actually any truth to the theory behind this disgusting advice. I quote below her emailed response:
Believe it or not, I've had clients come to me and call me with this question since the show aired. First, a dog's mouth is filthy in comparison to a human's mouth. There is a reason why we get tetanus shots and prescribe antibiotics when someone is bitten by a dog. In fact, there is bacteria in a dog's mouth that is not found in many other species that is strong enough to allow them to eat rotten carcasses and the like and not get sick. These bacteria are only good bacteria for a dog - NOT for a human.
Second, and probably more important to denounce than the claim that a dog's saliva will heal a rash is that when a bitch has puppies, the last thing you want to do is take it away from its puppies and place it anywhere near a human baby. They are stressed out and hormonal for a very long time after they give birth. Imagine having a baby and a few weeks later, someone takes you away from your baby and sticks your face in a dog's bum. How happy would you be about it? Well, a dog is going to be even more pissed off because they don't rationalize like humans, therefore making them prone to aggressive behavior, and in a case like this, particularly biting a babies genitals or simply mauling the child or the person who is trying to get the dog to do something completely out of character.
Rosie's advice was dangerous and unfounded and if a doctor really told her to do it - the state should revoke his/her license at the same time they are removing Rosie O'Donnell's children from her care.
So folks, there you have it. REAL expert advice and then some. Here's how I see this thing panning out...
Some idiot is going to try this and their child is going to be mauled, possibly killed. They're going to sue Rosie O'Donnell and ABC for not making a public correction for this terrible advice, and they're going to be rich. My take on it is that if someone is so perverse as to let a dog anywhere near your child's "hynee", the state should take your kids when they're rounding up Rosie's.
Saturday, September 16, 2006
No Apologies for Truth
"Those who reject Islam shall be hunted and killed where they stand"
"Slay those who insult Islam"
"Behead those who insult Islam"
"Be prepared for the real holocaust"
"Whoever offends our Prophet Mohammed should be killed on the spot by the nearest Muslim,"
"Know that Pardise is under the shades of swords"
Who said all those terrible things? Muslims.
What do we conclude from these statements? That Islam is not a religion of peace, but rather a religion that is spread by violence and hate by people who want to dominate the world and that the teachings of their "messiah", known as Muhammad, are brutal and violent.
In his speech at the University of Regensburg, Pope Benedict quoted criticism of Islam and the Prophet Mohammad by 14th century Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus, who wrote that everything Mohammad brought was evil and inhuman, "such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached".
Pope Benedict repeatedly quoted Manuel's argument that spreading the faith through violence is unreasonable, adding: "Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul."
Reasonable statements? Absolutely! Hate-filled? No way! Threatening? Of course not! The TRUTH? You betcha!!!!!
Muslims reacted to the Pope's statements. How? By showing love and mercy and giving examples of the peacefulness and non-violent nature of their religion? Nope...by proving him right.
Muslims have this to say,
"Swine and servant of the cross, worships a monkey on a cross, hateful evil man, stoned Satan, may Allah curse him, blood-sucking vampire."
The Pope owes NO APOLOGY.
Sunday, September 10, 2006
AMBER ALERT ENDANGERED
Date Missing: 8/27/2006
Missing From: Leesburg,FL
Birth Date: 8/10/2004
Age Disappeared: 2 yrs
Height: 3' 00"
Narrative: TRENTON WAS LAST SEEN WEARING A BLUE AND GREEN STRIPED SHIRT, OR NO SHIRT, DENIM SHORTS AND A DIAPER. THE CHILD WAS LAST SEEN IN THE AREA OF THE 1400 BLOCK OF GRIFFIN ROAD 48 AND IS BELIEVED TO BE IN DANGER. TRENTON HAS A SMALL MARK OVER HIS LEFT EYE. TRENTON IS BIRACIAL; HE IS ASIAN AND WHITE.
If you have any information concerning the whereabouts of this child, please contact the Leesburg Police Department at 352-787-2121 or 911
Thursday, September 07, 2006
Grow up and smell the truth!!!
The first time the MSM tells the truth in 20 years and the libs are crying foul....
Message to Clinton (whoremonger), Berger (thief) and Albright (pig!)...SHUT UP...SHUT UP...SHUT UP...The truth hurts way worse than empty allegations. TAKE. YOUR. MEDICINE.
Monday, September 04, 2006
The Truth About HPV
I've been outraged by the commercials that talk about the Human papillomavirus. Why? Because the commercials are intended to create panic among women of all ages who are being told that they should tell all their friends, moms, aunts and sisters that cervical cancer is caused by HPV.
So, what's the problem? Well, for one thing, the verbage used in these commercials lead people to believe that all cervical cancer comes from this virus. It does not.
Second, they fail to mention that the Human Papillomavirus is a sexually transmitted disease. It is.
Much like the AIDS paranoia of the mid-80', this campaign is designed to do two things...
1. To get as many women as possible to spend money on the testing and pharmaceuticals used to diagnose and prevent HPV.
2. Sugar coat the dangers of promiscuous sex and promote the liberal "if it feels good - do it" agenda.
So, what's the problem? People need to take precautions, right? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, right? WRONG. This is no different than the days when the media fed us all a line of bull about AIDS. Like the 1985 Life Magazine cover that announced, "NOW, NO ONE IS SAFE FROM AIDS", which was designed to convince Americans that heterosexuals were as much at risk for acquiring AIDS as gays and intravenous drug users. This liberal hogwash was all about downplaying the filth that spread the disease and creating the kind of hysteria in the mainstream that makes billions for pharmaceutical companies who develop tests to rule out AIDS infection of middle aged housewives in Bismarck, North Dakota. It was a win-win situation. Take the spotlight off homosexuals and druggies while at the same time - making billions. Beautiful, isn't it?
In 1987, the CDC predicted that AIDS would be the number one killer of heterosexuals by 1991. As of right now, 15 years later, AIDS doesn't even make it into the top ten. In fact, according to the CDC, almost 70 percent of AIDS victims in America acquired the virus through homosexual sex or intravenous drug use. Only 13 percent of cases are even alleged to be through heterosexual contact. Also noted should be the fact that the recorded methods of transmission are based almost entirely on self-reports and no one who gets the virus from heterosexual sex lies and says he got it from homosexual sex or intravenous drug use, but the reverse is not true.
Now that the AIDS hysteria has died down, evidently the liberal liars need a new type of panic. The type that not only gets grandmothers and nuns to have tests for a sexually transmitted disease that they are not at risk for, but to pay for a vaccination to prevent it. The best yet, though, is the latest plug that encourages mothers and fathers all over America to take their young daughters to the doctor for a vaccination to prevent a sexually transmitted disease on the pretense that they may be preventing cancer - rather than teaching their kids that abstaining from sex is a much better path to take.
So, yeah - I'm mad as hell that the healthcare community is, once again, standing by while a major misrepresentation of facts is being perpetrated by pharmaceutical companies and the media. So, let's set the record straight....
If you have sex with someone other than your husband (or your husband is having sex outside the marriage) or you are a young person having sex outside the boundaries of a personal, lifetime commitment, you are at risk for a sexually transmitted disease that may put you at risk of developing cervical cancer. If, however, you are not doing these things - you're not going to develop HPV because it is a SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE. And it's perfectly o.k. for parents to use this as yet another example of why it's important to abstain.